|Table of Contents|

Analysis of bypass regulation characteristics for spaceclosed Brayton cycle system(PDF)

¡¶»ð¼ýÍƽø¡·[ISSN:1672-9374/CN:CN 61-1436/V]

Issue:
2021Äê02ÆÚ
Page:
61-67
Research Field:
Ñо¿ÓëÉè¼Æ
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Analysis of bypass regulation characteristics for spaceclosed Brayton cycle system
Author(s):
WANG Haoming12XUE Xiang12 ZHANG Yinyong12LIN Qinguo12
1Shanghai Institute of Space Propulsion, Shanghai 201112, China; 2Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Space Engine, Shanghai 201112, China
Keywords:
closed Brayton cycle dynamic simulation bypass regulation valve opening response time
PACS:
V476.2
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Closed Brayton cycle is an effective way of high-power thermo-electrical conversion in the future space mission, and the bypass adjustment is an effective way to realize fast power regulation and rotating speed control. Through the cycle parameters of thermo-electrical conversion system in Prometheus Project of US, the aerodynamic designs of turbine and compressor were finished as well as the performance of heat exchangers. Then, a dynamic simulation model was obtained based on the components characteristics and pipeline layout. Based on this dynamic model, the effort of different response time and opening degree of the bypass valve on the system power output, rotating speed, cycle temperature, pressure and other system parameters were simulated The results show that the power output and rotating speed of the closed apace Brayton cycle system decrease rapidly after the bypass valve opening, especially the power overshoot occurs in the process. The pressure in the high-pressure side decreases and it decreases in the low-pressure side. The inlet temperature of recuperator hot side increases, but the inlet temperature of cold side decrease, and the thermal stress of recuperator further increases. The sensibility for bypass regulation can be reduced by improving system volume inertia.

References:

[1] ROSEN R, SCHNYERA D. Civilian uses of nuclear reactors in space[J]. Science & Global Security, 1989, 1(1/2): 147-164. [2] STANCULESCU A. The role of nuclear power and nuclear propulsion in the peaceful exploration of space[M]. Vienna: Intl Atomic Energy Agency, 2005. [3] LYONS V J, GONZALEZ G A, HOUTS M G,et al. Space power and energy storage roadmap[R]. Washington DC: NASA, 2012. [4] GABRIELLI R A, HERDRICH G. Review ofnuclear thermal propulsion systems[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2015, 79: 92-113. [5] ÀîÇ¿, Àî¼ÒÎÄ, Íõ¸ê, µÈ. ÐÂÐÍ¿Õ¼ä˫ģʽºËÈÈÍƽøϵͳÈÈÁ¦Ñ§ÐÔÄÜÑо¿[J]. »ð¼ýÍƽø, 2018, 44(6): 21-28.LI Q, LI J W, WANG G, et al. Research on thermodynamic performance of a new aerospace nuclearthermal propulsion system[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2018, 44(6): 21-28. [6] BARNETT J W. Nuclear electric propulsion technologies: Overview of the NASA/DOE/DOD nuclear electric propulsion workshop[C]// AIP Conference Proceedings. New Mexico: American Institute of Physics, 1991. [7] ºú¹Å, ÕÔÊØÖÇ. ¿Õ¼äºË·´Ó¦¶ÑµçÔ´¼¼Êõ¸ÅÀÀ[J]. Éî¿Õ̽²âѧ±¨, 2017, 4(5): 430-443. [8] DATAS A,MARTÿ?‚ˆ A. Thermophotovoltaic energy in space applications: Review and future potential[J]. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2017, 161: 285-296.[LinkOut] [9] TORO C, LIOR N. Analysis and comparison of solar-heat driven Stirling, Brayton and Rankine cycles for space power generation[J]. Energy, 2017, 120: 549-564.[LinkOut] [10] MASON L S. A comparison ofBrayton and Stirling space nuclear power systems for power levels from 1 kilowatt to 10 megawatts[C]//AIP Conference Proceedings. New Mexico: American Institute of Physics, 2001. [11] KOROTEEV A S, ANDIANOV D I, KAREVSKIY A V, et al. Test bench for key components of megawatt class international power and propulsion system ground demonstration[C]// 7th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences. Milan, Italy: EUCASS 2017. [12] MASON L S. A power conversion concept for theJupiter icy moons orbiter[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2004, 20(5): 902-910.[LinkOut] [13] BIONDI A, TORO C. Closed Brayton Cycles for Power Generation in Space: Modeling, simulation and exergy analysis[J]. Energy, 2019, 181: 793-802. [14] WRIGHT S A, LIPINSKI R J, VERNON M E, et al. Closed Brayton cycle power conversion systems for nuclear reactors: [R]. Office of Scientific and Technical Information(OSTI), 2006. [15] MASON L S, SCHREIBER J G. A historical review of brayton and stirling power conversion technologies for space applications[C]//2007: 145-153. [16] JOHNSON P K, MASON L S. Initial test results of a dual closed-brayton-cycle power conversion system[EB/OL]. 2007 [17] KOROTEEV A S, KAREVSKIY AV, LOVTSOV A S, et al. Study of operation of power and propulsion system based on closed brayton cycle power conversion unit and electric propulsion[C]// 36th International Electric Propulsion Conference. University of Vienna, Austria:[s.n.], 2019. [18] ·ëÖÂÔ¶, ÕÅê»´º, ¼ªÓî, µÈ. º½ÌìÆ÷ºË¶¯Á¦ÍƽøϵͳÈÈÁ¦Ñ§ÐÔÄÜÑо¿[J]. ÔØÈ˺½Ìì, 2016, 22(6): 797-804. [19] ZHAO H, DENG Q H, HUANG W T, et al. Thermodynamic and economic analysis and multi-objective optimization of supercritical CO2 brayton cycles[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2016, 138(8): 081602. [20] LIU H Q, CHI Z R, ZANG S S. Optimization of a closed Brayton cycle for space power systems[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020, 179: 115611. [21] MASON LS. Powe conversion concept designed for the Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter: 20050192432 [R]. NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland: Research and Technology, 2003. [22] DE OLUMAYEGUN O, WANG M H, KELSALL G. Closed-cycle gas turbine for power generation: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Fuel, 2016, 180: 694-717. [23] ROMANO L F, RIBEIRO GB. Optimal temperature of operation of the cold side of a closed Brayton cycle for space nuclear propulsion[C]// International Nuclear Atlantic Conference. Brazil: [s.n.],2017. [24] TOURNIER J M, EL-GENK M, GALLO B. Best estimates of binary gas mixtures properties for closed brayton cycle space applications[C]//4th International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference and Exhibit(IECEC). San Diego, California.: AIAA, 2006. [25] BARRETT M. Performance expectations of closed brayton-cycle heat exchangers in 100-kWe nuclear space power systems[C]//1st International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference(IECEC). Portsmouth, Virginia: AIAA, 2003. [26] ºÂºÆÈ», ÑîСÓÂ, Íõ½Ý. ÅÔ··§µ÷½Ú¶Ô¸ßÎÂÆøÀä¶Ñ±Õʽ²¼À׶ÙÑ­»·Ë²Ì¬ÌØÐÔÓ°ÏìÑо¿[J]. Ô­×ÓÄÜ¿Æѧ¼¼Êõ, 2016, 50(4): 612-620.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 1900-01-01