|Table of Contents|

Numerical analysis and model establishment on effective pore diameter of Dutch twill weave (PDF)

《火箭推进》[ISSN:1672-9374/CN:CN 61-1436/V]

Issue:
2023年03期
Page:
26-33
Research Field:
目次
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Numerical analysis and model establishment on effective pore diameter of Dutch twill weave
Author(s):
MA Yuan1;  DONG Yan1;  LI Jian1;  LI Yanzhong1;  WANG Bin2;  HE Peng2
(1.Department of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China; 2.Shanghai Aerospace System Engineering Institute, Shanghai 201109, China)
Keywords:
cryogenic propellant;  orbital gas-liquid separation;  Dutch twill weave;  bubble point pressure;  effective pore diameter
PACS:
V511+.6
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Bubble point pressure is one of the key indexes to characterize the gas-liquid separation performance of the screen channel liquid acquisition devices, and the effective pore diameter of the screen is the core parameter to accurately predict the bubble point pressure. In the face of the limitation that the existing research is still mainly based on the experimental measuring method to obtain the effective pore diameter of screens, the structural characteristics of the fluid domain within the screen are obtained by constructing the three-dimensional geometry model of the real structure of Dutch twill weave(DTW)in this paper. The numerical study on the bubble point pressure at the characteristic throat is conducted based on the surface tension model and pressure boundary setting. A calculation model of effective pore diameter based on geometrical structure parameters of screen is proposed. The results show that the characteristic throat, which determines the bubble point pressure of DTW, is located near z=±(rw+rs)and is of a nearly closed quadrilateral boundary. In view of the characteristic throat section, the prediction of the effective pore diameter derived from the numerical simulation of bubble point pressure, is of a relative error less than 6% compared to the experimental data in literatures. Through the proposed effective pore diameter model, the predicted results are also in good agreement with literatures' experimental data, and the average error is less than 10%. The accurate prediction of thescreen's effective pore diameter can be achieved and is independent of the experimental measurement, which could provide important support for the performance analysis of screen's bubble point pressure and the design optimization of liquid acquisition devices.

References:

[1] HARTWIG J W.Propellant management devices for low-gravity fluid management:Past,present,and future applications[J].Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets,2017,54(4):808-824.
[2] 马原,厉彦忠,王磊,等.低温推进剂在轨加注技术与方案研究综述[J].宇航学报,2016,37(3):245-252.
[3] MA Y,ZIMNIK D,DREYER M,et al.Investigation on cryo-wicking performance within metallic weaves under superheated conditions for screen channel liquid acquisition devices(LADs)[J].International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2019,141:530-541.
[4] 马原,陈虹,邢科伟,等.低温推进剂网幕通道式液体获取装置性能研究进展[J].制冷学报,2019,40(3):1-7.
[5] KUDLAC M,JURNS J.Screen channel liquid acquisition devices for liquid oxygen[C]//42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit.Reston,Virginia:AIAA,2006.
[6] JURNS J,MCQUILLEN J,GABY J,et al.Bubble point measurements with liquid methane of a screen channel capillary liquid acquisition device[R].NASA/TM-215494.
[7] JURNS J M,HARTWIG J W.Liquid oxygen liquid acquisition device bubble point tests with high pressure LOx at elevated temperatures[J].Cryogenics,2012,52(4/5/6):283-289.
[8] HARTWIG J,MANN J A,DARR S R.Parametric analysis of the liquid hydrogen and nitrogen bubble point pressure for cryogenic liquid acquisition devices[J].Cryogenics,2014,63:25-36.
[9] HARTWIG J,MCQUILLEN J.Screen channel liquid-acquisition-device bubble point tests in liquid methane[J].Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer,2014,29(2):364-375.
[10] HARTWIG J W.Screen channel liquid acquisition device bubble point tests in liquid nitrogen[J].Cryogenics,2016,74:95-105.
[11] HARTWIG J,CHATO D,MCQUILLEN J.Screen channel LAD bubble point tests in liquid hydrogen[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2014,39(2):853-861.
[12] MESEROLE J S,JONES O S.Pressurant effects on cryogenic liquid acquisition devices[J].Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets,1993,30(2):236-243.
[13] SAVAS A J,HARTWIG J W,MODER J P.Thermal analysis of a cryogenic liquid acquisition device under autogenous and non-condensable pressurization schemes[J].International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2014,74:403-413.
[14] CONRATH M,DREYER M.Gas breakthrough at a porous screen[J].International Journal of Multiphase Flow,2012,42:29-41.
[15] CONRATH M,SMIYUKHA Y,FUHRMANN E,et al.Double porous screen element for gas-liquid phase separation[J].International Journal of Multiphase Flow,2013,50:1-15.
[16] HARTWIG J W,KAMOTANI Y.The static bubble point pressure model for cryogenic screen channel liquid acquisition devices[J].International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2016,101:502-516.
[17] CAMAROTTI C,DENG O,DARR S,et al.Room temperature bubble point,flow-through screen,and wicking experiments for screen channel liquid acquisition devices[J].Applied Thermal Engineering,2019,149:1170-1185.
[18] SYMONS E.Wicking of liquids in screens[EB/OL].https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Wicking-of-liquids-in-screens-Symons/80e01bf3b2c22893e013cca27187
200846707724,1974.
[19] HARTWIG J,MANN J A.A predictive bubble point pressure model for porous liquid acquisition device screens[J].Journal of Porous Media,2014,17(7):587-600.
[20] HARTWIG J W,KAMOTANI Y.The static reseal pressure model for cryogenic screen channel liquid acquisition devices[J].International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2016,99:31-43.
[21] HARTWIG J,DARR S.Influential factors for liquid acquisition device screen selection for cryogenic propulsion systems[J].Applied Thermal Engineering,2014,66(1/2):548-562.
[22] MA Y,LI Y Z,WANG L,et al.Investigation on isothermal wicking performance within metallic weaves for screen channel liquid acquisition devices(LADs)[J].International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2019,135:392-402.
[23] 马原,孙靖阳,厉彦忠,等.增压速率对多孔金属筛网泡破压力影响的实验研究[J].西安交通大学学报,2021,55(11):192-198.
[24] 蒋玉婷,张鹏,颛瑞.高蒸发率下筛网通道式液体获取装置的金属筛网毛细性能研究[J].低温与超导,2021,49(1):6-15.
[25] 朱文杰,张瑞平,黄立钠,等.筛网LAD通道液氮动态出流性能研究[J].低温工程,2022(1):46-50.
[26] 刘畅,肖泽宁,胡声超,等.筛网通道液体获取装置压降模型及试验研究[J].导弹与航天运载技术,2021(1):56-60.
[27] 王晔,张婉雨,汪彬,等.多孔网幕泡破压力预测模型的建立及实验验证[J].化工学报,2022,73(3):1102-1110.
[28] MASOODI R,PILLAI K M.Wicking in porous materials:Traditional and modern modeling approaches[M].Boca Raton,FL:CRC Press,2012.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 1900-01-01