PDF下载 分享
[1]刘昌波,雷凡培,周立新.雾化过程的一种Euler-Lagrangian耦合算法[J].火箭推进,2015,41(02):21-32.
　LIU Chang-bo,LEI Fan-pei,ZHOU Li-xin.An Euler-Lagrangian coupling method of primary atomization[J].Journal of Rocket Propulsion,2015,41(02):21-32.
点击复制

雾化过程的一种Euler-Lagrangian耦合算法

《火箭推进》[ISSN:1672-9374/CN:CN 61-1436/V] 卷: 41 期数: 2015年02期 页码: 21-32 栏目: 研究与设计 出版日期: 2015-07-30
Title:
An Euler-Lagrangian coupling method of primary atomization
作者:
刘昌波1; 雷凡培2; 周立新1
1. 西安航天动力研究所，陕西 西安 710100；2. 中国航天科技集团公司，北京 100037
Author(s):
LIU Chang-bo1;  LEI Fan-pei2;  ZHOU Li-xin1
1. Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute, Xi’an 710100, China; 2. China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation, Beijing 100037, China
关键词:
雾化;  VOF法;  拉格朗日粒子追踪;  大涡模拟;  撞击式
Keywords:
primary atomization;  Volume-of-Fluid;  Lagrangian particle tracking;  large eddy si- mulation;  impinging atomization CLC Number：V430-34 Document code：A Article ID：1672-9374(2011)02-0021-12
分类号:
V436-34
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
对雾化过程的直接数值模拟需要巨大的计算资源和时间，而工程中的简化模型则经常会给出错误的结果。因此，可以折中地采用一种混合方法，即在不同尺度上采用不同的模型。提出了一种雾化过程的欧拉——拉格朗日耦合算法。较大的液团采用VOF法直接求解，与网格尺度相当或更小的液滴则采用双向耦合的拉格朗日粒子法进行追踪。而该方法要求粒子的体积小于网格体积的10%，为此又提出了一种虚网格粒子追踪法。由于湍流结构对雾化过程的影响很大，故湍流采用了大涡模拟模型。采用多个算例对开发的算法进行了验证，并对部分关键参数的影响进行了深入研究。采用新算法对两股撞击射流的雾化过程进行了研究，瞬态和统计结果均表明新算法能够给出良好的预测。
Abstract:
For primary atomization simulations, Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) requires huge computational resources and time, and simplified models used cursorily in engineering usually give unphysical results. Then a method with hybrid models in different scales is a compromise. An Euler-Lagrangian coupling method of primary atomization is proposed in this paper. The larger liquid blobs are captured by the Volume-of-Fluid (VOF) method, and the droplets comparable with the grid volume or smaller ones are tracked by a two-way coupling LPT model. Since the volume of a Lagrangian Particle Tacking (LPT) particle must be less than 10% of the Lagrangian cell volume, a new LPT method on a virtual mesh is proposed. And a Large Eddy Simulation (LES) model is used to describe the larger vortex structures which are one of the determinants for primary atomization. The developed code is verified by several cases, and some key parameters are investigated to improve its precision. The primary atomization of two impinging jets is calculated by the new method, and the results of instantaneous and time-averaged characteristics show that the new method can give promising prediction.

参考文献/References:

[1]REITZ R D. Modeling atomization processes in high-pressure vaporizing sprays[J]. Atomization and Spray Technology, 1987, 3(4): 309-337.
[2]O'ROURKE P J, AMSDEN A A. The TAB method for numerical calculation of spray droplet breakup[R]. USA: SAE, 1987.
[3]HUH K Y, GOSMAN A D. A phenomenological model of diesel spray atomization[C]// Proceedings of International Conference for Multiphase Flow. Japan: University of Tsukuba, 1991: 24-27.
[4]CHANG S K, KOO J Y, CHUNG H C. Transient liquid jet breakup model and comparison with phase Doppler measurements[J]. KSME International Journal, 1995, 9(1): 41- 50.

[5]KOO J Y. An overview of liquid spray modeling formed by high-shear nozzle/swirler assembly[J]. KSME International Journal, 2003, 17(5): 726-739.

[6]TRINH H P, CHEN C P. Modeling of turbulent effects on liquid jet atomization and breakup, AIAA-2005-154[R]. USA: AIAA, 2005.
[7]DESJARDINS O, MOUREAU V, PITSCH H. An accurate conservative level set/ghost fluid method for simula- ting turbulent atomization[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2008, 227(18): 8395-8416.
[8]FUSTER D, BAGUE A, BOECK T, et al. Simulation of primary atomization with an octree adaptive mesh refinement and VOF method[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2009, 35(6): 550-565.
[9]IANG X, SIAMAS G A, JAGUS K, et al. Physical mo- delling and advanced simulations of gas-liquid two-phase jet flows in atomization and sprays[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2010, 36(2): 131-167.
[10]CHEN X D, MA D J, YANG V. Mechanism study of impact wave in impinging jets atomization, AIAA-2012- 1089[R]. USA: AIAA, 2012.
[11]HERRMANN M. Refined level set grid method for tra- cking interface [R]. USA: Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, 2005.
[12]HERRMANN M. A parallel Eulerian interface tracking/ Lagrangian point particle multiscale coupling procedure[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2010, 229(3): 745-759.
[13]GROSSHANS H, SZ?SZ R Z, FUCHS L. Full spray si- mulation-coupled volume of fluid and Lagrangian particle tracking methods[C]// 24th European Confer-ence on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems. Estoril, Portugal:[s.n.],2011: 120-128.
[14]TOMAR G, FUSTER D, ZALESKI S, et al. Multiscale simulations of primary atomization[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2010, 36(10): 1864-1874.
[15]POPINET S. Gerris: a tree-based adaptive solver for the incompressible Euler equations in complex geometries [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2003, 190(2): 572-600.
[16]MA D, CHEN X, KHARE P, et al. Atomization pat-terns and breakup characteristics of liquid sheets formed by two impinging jets, AIAA-2011-97[R]. USA: AIAA, 2011.
[17]VALLIER A, REVSTEDT J, NILSSON H. Procedure for the break-up of cavitation sheet[C]// 4th Interna-tional Meeting on Cavitation and Dynamic Problems in Hydraulic Machinery and Systems. Belgrade, Serbia, 2011: 111-120.
[18]WELLER H G, TABOR G, JASAK H, et al. A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-orientated techniques[J]. Computers in Physics, 1998, 12(6): 620-630.
[19]BRACKBILL J U, KOTHE D B, ZEMACH C. A con- tinuum method for modeling surface tension[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1992, 100(2): 335-354.
[20]RUSCHE H. Computational fluid dynamics of dispersed two-phase flows at high phase fractions[D]. London: Diploma of Imperial College, University of London, 2002.
[21]BERBEROVICE. Investigation of free-surface flow associated with drop impact: numerical simulations and theoretical modeling[D]. Germany: Bosnien und Herzegowina, Technischen Universit?覿t Darmstadt zur, aus Zenica, 2010.
[22]WELLER H G. A new approach to VOF-based interface capturing methods for incompressible and compressible flow [R]. [S.L.]:OpenCFD Ltd., 2008.
[23]YOSHIZAWA A, HORIUTI K. A statistically-derived subgrid-scale kinetic energy model for the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows[J]. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 1985, 54(8): 2834-2839.
[24]TOUTANT A, LABOURASSE E, LEBAIGUE O, et al. DNS of the interaction between a deformable buoyant bubble and a spatially decaying turbulence: A priori tests for LES two-phase flow modeling[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2008, 37(7): 877-886.
[25]VILLIERS E D, GOSMAN A D, WELLER H G. Large eddy simulation of primary diesel spray atomization, 2004-01-0100 [R]. USA: SAE, 2004.
[26]ERNE G, PETELIN S, TISELJ I. Numerical errors of the volume-of-fluid interface tracking algorithm[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2002, 38(4): 329-350.
[27]ARLOV D, REVSTEDT J, FUCHS L. A different ap- proach for handling large bubbles in a square cross-sectioned bubble column combining large eddy simulation with Lagrangian particle tracking[C]// 6th International Conference on Multiphase Flow. Leipzig, Germany:[s.n.], 2007: 56-62.
[28]LI X Y, SOTERIOU M C. Prediction of high density-ratio liquid jet atomization in crossflow using high fidelity simulations on HPC, AIAA-2012-0175[R]. USA: AIAA, 2012.
[29]ZHANG M, ZHANG Z, LI A, et al. Experimental re- search on spray properties of unlike impinging injectors [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2000, 21(1): 57- 59. (in Chinese)
[30]EGGELS J, UNGER F, WEISS M, et al. Fully deve- loped turbulent pipe flow: a comparison between direct numerical simulation and experiment[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1994, 268(12): 175-209.
[31]RUDMAN M AND BLACKBURN H M. Large eddy simulation of turbulent pipe flow[C]// Proceedings of Second International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries, Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO, 1999: 23-30.
[32]VILLIERS E D. The potential of large eddy simulation for the modeling of wall bounded flows[D]. London: Imperial College of Science, 2006.
[33]JUNG K, KHIL T, YOON Y, et al. The breakup characteristics of liquid sheets formed by like-doublet injectors, AIAA-2002-4177[R]. USA: AIAA, 2002.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨伟东,张蒙正.凝胶推进剂流变及雾化特性研究与进展[J].火箭推进,2005,31(05):41.
　Yang Weidong,Zhang Mengzheng.Research and development of rheological and atomization characteristics of gelled propellants[J].Journal of Rocket Propulsion,2005,31(02):41.
[2]王玫,李鳌,张志涛,等.运用高速动态分析系统研究喷嘴雾化性能[J].火箭推进,2004,(02):6.
[3]代予东.凝胶燃料的雾化特性表征[J].火箭推进,2004,(03):57.
[4]宋大亮,凌前程,章荣军.双组元离心式喷嘴外喷嘴流动数值模拟分析[J].火箭推进,2018,44(04):10.
　SONG Daliang,LING Qiancheng,ZHANG Rongjun.Numerical analysis on flow characteristics of outer nozzle of bipropellant pressure-swirl injector[J].Journal of Rocket Propulsion,2018,44(02):10.

备注/Memo

Received date: 2014-11-26; Revised date: 2015-01-17 Foundation Item: “973” key project of Chinese national programs for fundamental research and development （613193） Biography: LIU Chang-bo(1979—), male, doctor, speciality: research on liquid rocket engin

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01