PDF下载 分享
[1]姚家旭,雷 蒋.不同横向距离下双射流孔流动与冷却特性实验研究[J].火箭推进,2018,44(01):36-43.
　YAO Jiaxu,LEI Jiang.Experimental study on flow and cooling characteristics of double-jet film-cooling holes at different spanwise distances[J].Journal of Rocket Propulsion,2018,44(01):36-43.
点击复制

不同横向距离下双射流孔流动与冷却特性实验研究

《火箭推进》[ISSN:1672-9374/CN:CN 61-1436/V] 卷: 44 期数: 2018年01期 页码: 36-43 栏目: 研究与设计 出版日期: 2018-02-28
Title:
Experimental study on flow and cooling characteristics of double-jet film-cooling holes at different spanwise distances
文章编号:
1672-9374(2018)01-0036-08
作者:
姚家旭;  雷 蒋
西安交通大学 机械结构强度与振动国家重点实验室 力学实验教学国家示范中心 航天航空学院,陕西 西安 710049
Author(s):
YAO Jiaxu;  LEI Jiang
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanics Education, School of Aerospace, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China
关键词:
气膜冷却;  双射流;  压力敏感漆
Keywords:
film-cooling;  double-jet;  pressure sensitive paint
分类号:
V434-34
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过实验方式,在平板上对不同孔间横向距离(p/d=0,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0)下的双射流气膜冷却结构进行了研究。使用七孔探针测量了孔下游不同截面处的时均流场,使用压力敏感漆(PSP)测量了平板表面的气膜冷却效率。孔间流向距离(s/d)为3.0。吹风比(M)为0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,射流-主流密度比为1.0。研究了孔间横向距离对双射流间相互作用,及其流动和冷却特性的影响。结果表明,p/d=0时,孔间相互作用体现为压附效应,下游射流被上游射流压向壁面并保持贴附,气膜冷却效率对吹风比不敏感。p/d=0.5与1.0时,反肾形涡效应主导,两股射流均被压向壁面,气膜覆盖较好,冷却效率较高。p/d≥1.5时,压附效应基本消失,反肾形涡效应减弱,射流间距增加,气膜覆盖变差。
Abstract:
Double-jet film-cooling structures on a flat plate at different spanwise distances(p/d=0,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0)are investigated experimentally.The time-averaged flow field at several cross-sections in downstream of the holes is measured by a seven-hole probe, and the film-cooling effectiveness on surface of the flat plate is measured with pressure sensitive paint(PSP).The measured results indicate that the streamwise distance(s/d)is 3.0, and the blowing ratio(M)is 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 while the density ratio(DR)is 1.0.The interaction between the two jets, its influence on the flow and cooling characters are investigated.The results show that, as p/d=0, the interaction between the holes is presented as pressing effect, that is, the downstream jet is pressed on the wall surface by the upstream one and keeps attached to the surface, and the film-cooling effectiveness is not sensitive to blowing ratios; as p/d=0.5 and 1.0, the anti-kidney vortex effect dominates, both of the jets are pressed down on the surface, and the film coverage is good and the effectiveness is relatively high; as p/d≥1.5, the pressing effect almost disappears, the anti-kidney vortex effect weakens, the distance between the jets increases, and the film coverage degrades.

参考文献/References:

[1] SINHA A K, BOGARD D G, CRAWFORD M E. Film-cooling effectiveness downstream of a single row of holes with variable density ratio [J]. ASME journal of turbomachinery, 1991, 113(3): 442-449.
[2] HYAMS D G, LEYLEK J H. A detailed analysis of film cooling physics: Part III -streamwise injection with shaped holes[J]. ASME journal of turbomachinery, 2000, 122(1): 122-132.
[3] WRIGHT L M, MCCLAIN S T, BROWN C P, et al. Assessment of a couble hole film cooling geometry using S-PIV and PSP: GT2013-94614 [R]. USA: ASME, 2013.
[4] KUSTERER K, BOHN D, SUGIMOTO T, et al. Double-jet ejection of cooling air for improved film cooling [J]. ASME journal of turbomachinery, 2007, 129(4): 809-815.
[5] KUSTERER K, ELYAS A, BOHN D, et al. Film cooling effectiveness comparison between shaped- and double jet film cooling holes in a row arrangment [C]// Proceeings of ASME Turbo Expo 2010: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. [S.l.]: ASME, 2010: 1503-1515.
[6] WANG Z, LIU J J, AN B T, et al. Effects of axial row-spacing for double-jet film-cooling on the cooling effectiveness[C]// Proceedings of ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. [S.l.]: ASME, 2011: 483-492.
[7] WANG Z, LIU J J, ZHANG C. Impacts of geometric parameters of double-jet film cooling on anti-kidney vortex structure and cooling effectiveness: GT2013-94038 [R]. [S.l.]: ASME 2013.
[8] HAN C, REN J. Multi-parameter iInfluence on combined-hole film cooling system [J]. International journal of heat and mass transfer, 2012, 55(15): 4232-4240.
[9] HAN C, CHI Z R, REN J, et al. Optimal arrangement of combined-hole for improving film cooling effectiveness: GT2013-94561 [R]. [S.l.]: ASME, 2013.
[10] HAN J C, RALLABANDI A. Turbine blade film cooling using PSP technique [J]. Frontiers in heat and mass transfer(FHMT), 2010, 1(1): 101-109.
[11] KENDALL A, KOOCHESFAHANI M. A method for estimating wall friction in turbulent wall-bounded flows [J]. Experiments in fluids, 2008, 44(5): 773-780.
[12] WRIGHT L M, MCCLAIN S T, CLEMENSON M D. Effect of freestream turbulence intensity on film cooling jet structure and surface effectiveness using PIV and PSP [J]. ASME journal of turbomachinery, 2011, 133(4): 041023.
[13] WRIGHT L M, MCCLAIN S T, CLEMENSON M D. Effect of density ratio on flat plate film cooling with shaped holes using PSP [J]. ASME journal of turbomachinery, 2011, 133(4): 041011.
[14] KLINE S J, MCCLINTOCK F. Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments [J]. Mechanical engineering, 1953, 75(1): 3-8.

相似文献/References:

[1]王建,孙冰,魏玉坤.气膜冷却传热传质类比研究[J].火箭推进,2008,34(02):31.
　Wang Jianl,Sun Bing,Wei Yukun.Heat and mass transfer in gaseous film cooling[J].Journal of Rocket Propulsion,2008,34(01):31.
[2]任加万,谭永华.燃烧室缝槽气膜冷却方案研究[J].火箭推进,2007,33(06):28.
　Ren Jiawan,Tan Yonghua.Investigation on the structure scheme of slot air film cooling combustion chamber[J].Journal of Rocket Propulsion,2007,33(01):28.
[3]雷 蒋,鲁瑞山,秦 岭,等.静叶栅上游端壁双射流气膜冷却特性实验[J].火箭推进,2020,46(02):36.
　LEI Jiang,LU Ruishan,QIN Ling,et al.Experimental study of film-cooling characteristics of DJFC holes located upstream of a vane[J].Journal of Rocket Propulsion,2020,46(01):36.
[4]姚家旭,罗 丁,范 青,等.绝热气膜冷却效率的传热传质类比数值分析[J].火箭推进,2021,47(01):62.
　YAO Jiaxu,LUO Ding,FAN Qing,et al.Numerical analysis of heat-mass transfer analogy for adiabatic film-cooling effectiveness[J].Journal of Rocket Propulsion,2021,47(01):62.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2017-07-09; 修回日期:2017-08-30 基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51776153) 作者简介: 姚家旭(1993—),男,硕士研究生,研究领域为燃气轮机热端部件传热与冷却

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01