火箭推进

多模式性能是离子推力器产品应用及产品研制过程中需考虑的重要性能之一。通过对国内外成熟度较高的离子推力器产品的多模式性能对比分析,获得了不同类型离子推力器的多模式性能变化规律,证明了国内离子推力器的多模式性能已达到与国外先进多模式离子推力器相当的水平。定义和对比分析了多模式离子推力器的性能调节能力,结果表明直流环切场推力器性能调节能力最好,射频放电推力器次之,直流发散场推力器最低。

Multi-mode performance is one of the crucial aspects in the development and application of ion thruster. By comparing and analyzing the multi-mode performance of ion thrusters at home and abroad, the variation law of multi-mode performance of different types of ion thrusters is obtained, which proves that the multi-mode performance of domestic ion thrusters has come up to the advanced world level. At the same time, the performance adjustment capability of multi-mode ion thruster is defined and compared. In addition, the DC toroidal field thruster has the best performance adjustment ability, followed by the RF discharge thruster, and the DC divergent field thruster has the lowest performance adjustment ability.

引言
1 多模式离子推力器及其性能数据
2 几种多模式离子推力器性能对比
3 多模式离子推力器性能调节能力分析
4 结论

表1 各国的多模式离子推力器产品<br/>Tab.1 Multi-mode ion thruster products in various countries

表1 各国的多模式离子推力器产品
Tab.1 Multi-mode ion thruster products in various countries

表2 LIPS-400离子推力器性能数据<br/>Tab.2 Performance data of LIPS-400 ion thruster

表2 LIPS-400离子推力器性能数据
Tab.2 Performance data of LIPS-400 ion thruster

表3 NEXT离子推力器性能数据<br/>Tab.3 Performance data of NEXT ion thruster

表3 NEXT离子推力器性能数据
Tab.3 Performance data of NEXT ion thruster

表4 LIPS-300s离子推力器性能数据<br/>Tab.4 Performance data of LIPS-300s ion thruster

表4 LIPS-300s离子推力器性能数据
Tab.4 Performance data of LIPS-300s ion thruster

表5 NSTAR离子推力器性能数据<br/>Tab.5 Performance data of NSTAR ion thruster

表5 NSTAR离子推力器性能数据
Tab.5 Performance data of NSTAR ion thruster

表6 LIPS-100离子推力器性能数据<br/>Tab.6 Performance data of LIPS-100 ion thruster

表6 LIPS-100离子推力器性能数据
Tab.6 Performance data of LIPS-100 ion thruster

表7 IES-35、T5、T6、RIT-2X等离子推力器性能数据<br/>Tab.7 Performance data of IES-35, T5, T6, RIT-2X ion thruster

表7 IES-35、T5、T6、RIT-2X等离子推力器性能数据
Tab.7 Performance data of IES-35, T5, T6, RIT-2X ion thruster

图1 LIPS-400和NEXT推力器性能对比<br/>Fig.1 Comparison of the performance between LIPS-400 and NEXT

图1 LIPS-400和NEXT推力器性能对比
Fig.1 Comparison of the performance between LIPS-400 and NEXT

图2 LIPS-300s和NSTAR推力器性能对比<br/>Fig.2 Comparison of the performance between LIPS-300s and NSTAR

图2 LIPS-300s和NSTAR推力器性能对比
Fig.2 Comparison of the performance between LIPS-300s and NSTAR

图3 LIPS-100和T5推力器性能对比<br/>Fig.3 Comparison of the performance between LIPS-100 and T5

图3 LIPS-100和T5推力器性能对比
Fig.3 Comparison of the performance between LIPS-100 and T5

图4 T6、RIT-2X和IES-35推力器性能对比<br/>Fig.4 Comparison of the performance among T6, RIT-2X and IES-35

图4 T6、RIT-2X和IES-35推力器性能对比
Fig.4 Comparison of the performance among T6, RIT-2X and IES-35

图5 LIPS-400和NEXT的效率调节比与功率调节比关系<br/>Fig.5 Relation of efficiency regulation ratio and power regulation ratio between LIPS-400 and NEXT

图5 LIPS-400和NEXT的效率调节比与功率调节比关系
Fig.5 Relation of efficiency regulation ratio and power regulation ratio between LIPS-400 and NEXT

图6 LIPS-300s和NSTAR的效率调节比与功率调节比关系<br/>Fig.6 Relation of efficiency regulation ratio and power regulation ratio between LIPS-300s and NSTAR

图6 LIPS-300s和NSTAR的效率调节比与功率调节比关系
Fig.6 Relation of efficiency regulation ratio and power regulation ratio between LIPS-300s and NSTAR

图7 LIPS-100和T5的效率调节比与功率调节比关系<br/>Fig.7 Relation of efficiency regulation ratio and power regulation ratio between LIPS-100 and T5

图7 LIPS-100和T5的效率调节比与功率调节比关系
Fig.7 Relation of efficiency regulation ratio and power regulation ratio between LIPS-100 and T5

图8 LIPS-400、NSTAR、LIPS-100的功率调节比与效率降低比关系<br/>Fig.8 Relation of efficiency regulation ratio and power regulationratio among LIPS-400, NSTAR and LIPS-100

图8 LIPS-400、NSTAR、LIPS-100的功率调节比与效率降低比关系
Fig.8 Relation of efficiency regulation ratio and power regulationratio among LIPS-400, NSTAR and LIPS-100

[1] 张天平, 杨福全, 李娟, 等. 离子电推进技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020.
[2]GOEBEL D M,KTZ I. Fundamentals of electric propulsion: ion and Hall thruster[M]. La Canada Flintridge: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 2008.
[3]张天平, 张雪儿. 离子电推进的航天器应用实践及启示[J]. 真空与低温, 2019, 25(2): 73-81.
[4]赵以德, 张天平, 黄永杰, 等. 40 cm离子推力器功率宽范围工作实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(4): 942-947.
[5]LI J, ZHANG T P, ZHAO Y D, et al. Development of 10 kW LIPS-400 ion thruster[C]//7th CSA/IAA Conference on Advanced Space Technology, Space Technology Innovation and Space Commercialization. Shanghai, China: CSA, 2017.
[6]PATTERSON M, PINERO L, SOVEY J. Near-term high power ion propulsion options for earth-orbital applica-tions[C]//45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2009.
[7]THOMAS R E,AULISIO M V. NEXT single string integration tests in support of the double asteroid redirection test mission[C]//36th International Electric Propulsion Conference.[S.l.]:[s.n.], 2019.
[8]赵以德, 吴宗海, 张天平, 等. 离子推力器多模式化研究[J]. 推进技术, 2020, 41(1): 187-193.
[9]ZHANG X E, ZHANG T P, LI D T. Lifetime and mission reliability assessment of multi-mode ion thruster[J]. Journal of Electric Propulsion, 2022, 1(1): 5.
[10]POLK J E. Performance of the NSTAR ion propulsion system on the deep space one mission[C]//Aerospace Conference. New York:IEEE, 2013.
[11]GARNER C E,RAYMAN M D. In-flight operation of the Dawn ion propulsion system through completion of the final orbit transfer around Dwarf planet ceres[C]//2018 Joint Propulsion Conference. Cincinnati, Ohio:[s.n.], 2018.
[12]胡竟, 王东升, 杨福全, 等. 面向空间无拖曳飞行任务的连续变推力离子推力器研制[J]. 真空与低温, 2022, 28(1): 72-78.
[13]杨福全, 王成飞, 胡竟, 等. 超低轨道卫星应用离子电推进技术方案[J]. 中国空间科学技术, 2021, 41(3): 52-59.
[14]RANDALL P N,LEWIS R A,CLARK S D,et al. T5 performance, industrialisation and future applications[C]//36th International Electric Propulsion Conference. Wien, Austria:[s.n.], 2019.
[15]WALLACE N C. The GOCE ion propulsion assembly lessons learned from the first 22 months of flight operations[R]. IEPC-2011-327, 2011.
[16]SNYDER J, GOEBEL D M, HOFER R R, et al. Performance evaluation of the T6 ion engine[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2012, 28(2): 371-379.
[17]WALLACE N, SUTHERLAND O, BOLTER J, et al. Bepicolombo-solar electric propulsion system operations for the transit to mercury[C]//36th International Electric Propulsion Conference. [S.l.]:[s.n.], 2019.
[18]PORST J P,ALTMANN C H,ARNOLD C,et al. The RIT 2X propulsion system: current development status[C] //35th International Electric Propulsion Conference. Atlanta, Georgia:[s.n.], 2017.
[19]LEITER H J, ALTMANN C H,PORST J P, et al. Six decades of thrust-the Ariane group radiofrequency ion thrusters and systems family[Z]. 2017.
[20]HITOSHI K. Ambitious challenges of Japanese electric propulsion[C]//29th International Electric Propulsion Conference.Princeton: Princeton University, 2005.
[21]张天平,孟伟,张雪儿,等. 离子推力器产品型谱化发展研究[C]//中国第十七届电推进学术会议.兰州:[s.n.], 2021.
[22]PAVARIN D, ROCCA S, MANENTE M, et al. Multi-objective low-thruster trajectory optimization: variable and constant specific impulse[C]//4th International Spacecraft Propulsion Conference. Cagliari, Italy:[s.n.], 2004.
[23]CASALINO L, COLASURDO G. Trade-off between payload and trip-time for EP interplanetary trajectories[C]//40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. Reston, Virigina: AIAA, 2004.
[24]张天平, 张雪儿, 李璇. 离子与霍尔电推进性能和质量的工程数据模型[J]. 火箭推进, 2022, 48(1): 1-13.

备注

引言

1 多模式离子推力器及其性能数据

2 几种多模式离子推力器性能对比

3 多模式离子推力器性能调节能力分析

4 结论

期刊信息