基于层次分析法的吸热碳氢燃料评估指标体系设计

1.北京航天试验技术研究所,北京 100074; 2.航天绿色推进剂研究与应用北京市重点实验室,北京 100074; 3.中国人民解放军军事科学院 系统工程研究院,北京 100071

吸热碳氢燃料; 评估指标体系; 层次分析法; 判断矩阵; 权重值

Design of an evaluation index system for endothermic hydrocarbon fuel based on analytic hierarchy process
CHEN Xuejiao1,2,WANG Xiaoyu1,2,AN Gaojun3,XU Ximeng3,JIANG Rongpei1,2

1.Beijing Institute of Aerospace Testing Technology, Beijing 100074, China; 2.Beijing Key Laboratory of Research and Application forAerospace Green Propellants, Beijing 100074, China; 3.Systems Engineering Institute, Academy of Military Sciences, Beijing 100071, China

endothermic hydrocarbon fuel; evaluation index system; analytic hierarchy process; judgment matrix; weight value

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9374.2024.05.004

备注

为综合评价吸热碳氢燃料的整体性能,对吸热碳氢燃料研制、生产、使用、测试、贮存等各个环节的指标进行了有序整合,构建了吸热碳氢燃料评估指标体系。通过对吸热碳氢燃料的性能指标进行梳理和分类,根据层次分析法思想建立三级递阶层次结构模型,采用主观赋值法和一致性检验方法构建和筛选符合运算逻辑的判断矩阵,通过求解判断矩阵得到各指标权重值,对各指标的重要度进行了排序,并形成了评估指标体系的应用方法。研究结果将吸热碳氢燃料在各个环节中涉及的百余项评价指标“点”汇聚整合成为一套完整的评估体系“面”,为吸热碳氢燃料整体性能的评价提供了有效的方法,初步实现了吸热碳氢燃料综合性能定性评估到半定量评估的跨越,对新型吸热碳氢燃料的评价和发展具有重要应用价值。
To comprehensively assess the overall performance of endothermic hydrocarbon fuels, the indicators of various aspects including development, production, utilization, testing, and storage of endothermic hydrocarbon fuels were systematically integrated, and an evaluation index system for endothermic hydrocarbon fuels was constructed. By categorizing and organizing the performance indicators of endothermic hydrocarbon fuels, a three-tier hierarchical structure model was established using the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). Expert scoring and consistency testing methods were employed to create and refine judgment matrix that adhere to logical calculations. The weight values of each indicator were determined by solving the judgment matrix, and the importance of each indicator was ranked. More than one hundred evaluation indicators involved in various stages of endothermic hydrocarbon fuels are integrated into a comprehensive evaluation system, which fills the gap from qualitative assessment to semi-quantitative assessment of the comprehensive performance for endothermic hydrocarbon fuels. This study is valuable for the evaluation and development of novel endothermic hydrocarbon fuels.
·